Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have till February 6 to choose whether to willingly leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be permitted to depart and job be paid up until the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment legal representative who represents federal staff members as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s delayed resignation program would in fact mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact don’t consider it so much a deal. I believe it’s a demand to resign with a vague pledge that, potentially, you could be kept in administrative leave status for approximately 8 months – but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have been using the term buyout to describe what this is due to the fact that there seems to be the deal of administrative leave for as much as eight months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never explain it as a buyout. I think that’s an extremely misleading term to use in this scenario. When you think of a buyout, there’s typically some sort of written agreement or a concrete offer to supply an advantage in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: job If customers ask you for your suggestions, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is exercise severe . There are no guarantees contained in this e-mail. The only thing I can tell you for particular is that if you change your mind, the company’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially giving up control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of employee who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that may this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most mindful because leaving earlier than planned can have major repercussions, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is a bargain for people who don’t want to go back to the office. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is an idea to federal employees that they have to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the choice to resign, and this administration is extremely kindly using to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a method, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s developed to get folks who work truly hard to resign. I believe it’s trying to pull the wool over a lot of individuals’s eyes because there are no warranties. And these are people who like their job. They like the mission of the company. They strive. And right now, they’re facing very tough options, particularly if they’re remote. I indicate, it’s very coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who lives in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you expect legal difficulties just to the offer itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be sincere, is so unmatched that I believe a great deal of us are still trying to determine what to do with it. I’m not sure if the offer itself might be challengeable. I believe the larger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not conscious of any authority that exists today for OPM to purchase companies to provide this variety of individuals administrative leave. So I believe it is quite potentially setting the phase for challenges due to the fact that I feel OPM has actually vastly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for joining us.BERCOVICI: job Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our site regards to use and consents pages at www.npr.org for more details.

NPR records are produced on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not remain in its last kind and might be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and job availability might vary. The reliable record of NPR’s programs is the audio record.