This Stage used 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system business that develops open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the company in 2023 and functions as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 model provides reactions similar to other contemporary big language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a substantially lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of an equivalent LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were established amid United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to restrict the ability of these two countries to establish sophisticated AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its very first complimentary chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had gone beyond ChatGPT as the most-downloaded totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share price to come by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against larger and more established rivals has been explained as «upending AI», [8] making up «the very first chance at what is emerging as an international AI space race», [11] and ushering in «a new age of AI brinkmanship». [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, models, and training details open-source, enabling its code to be easily readily available for use, adjustment, watching, and developing documents for building functions. [13] The company apparently strongly recruits young AI researchers from leading Chinese universities, [8] and hires from outside the computer technology field to diversify its models’ knowledge and capabilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading given that the 2007-2008 financial crisis while attending Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer exclusively used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative expert system chatbot open source, indicating its code is easily readily available for use, modification, and watching. This consists of approval to access and utilize the source code, in addition to style documents, for constructing purposes. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had actually constructed up a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip restrictions on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer started an artificial general intelligence lab dedicated to research study developing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s financial organization. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the laboratory became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital companies hesitated in providing financing as it was not likely that it would have the ability to create an exit in a brief time period. [15]

After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong performance for a low rate, DeepSeek ended up being known as the driver for China’s AI model cost war. It was quickly called the «Pinduoduo of AI», and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the rate of their AI designs to complete with the business. Despite the low rate charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its competitors that were losing cash. [20]

DeepSeek is focused on research and has no in-depth prepare for commercialization; [20] this likewise enables its innovation to prevent the most rigid provisions of China’s AI guidelines, such as requiring consumer-facing innovation to comply with the federal government’s controls on information. [3]

DeepSeek’s working with choices target technical capabilities instead of work experience, leading to the majority of new hires being either recent university graduates or developers whose AI careers are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the business hires people with no computer technology background to help its technology understand other topics and understanding locations, consisting of having the ability to produce poetry and perform well on the infamously difficult Chinese college admissions tests (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its very first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is readily available for totally free to both scientists and commercial users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license contract («DeepSeek license») concerning «open and responsible downstream usage» for the design itself. [21]

They are of the very same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series includes 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of direction data. This produced the Instruct designs.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, connected by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek-LLM series of models, with 7B and 67B specifications in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was launched). It was established to complete with other LLMs offered at the time. The paper claimed benchmark outcomes greater than a lot of open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was basically the like those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text obtained by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the 2 Base designs was likewise launched concurrently, gotten by training Base by supervised finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B parameters (2.7 B activated per token, 4K context length). The training was basically the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared comparable performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the standard sparsely-gated MoE, with «shared specialists» that are always queried, and «routed specialists» that may not be. They discovered this to aid with expert balancing. In basic MoE, some professionals can end up being overly relied on, while other specialists may be rarely used, squandering parameters. Attempting to stabilize the experts so that they are similarly used then causes professionals to replicate the same capability. They proposed the shared experts to learn core capacities that are frequently utilized, and let the routed professionals to learn the peripheral capacities that are seldom used. [28]

In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K math issues and their tool-use-integrated detailed services. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The benefit model was a process benefit model (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd technique. [30] This benefit model was then utilized to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K math questions «related to GSM8K and MATH». The benefit design was continuously upgraded during training to prevent reward hacking. This resulted in the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 models, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two larger designs were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 phases. The first stage was trained to fix math and coding issues. This phase used 1 reward model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The second phase was trained to be helpful, safe, and follow rules. This stage used 3 reward models. The helpfulness and security reward models were trained on human choice information. The rule-based reward model was manually set. All skilled reward designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the launched version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They chose 2-staged RL, because they found that RL on thinking data had «distinct attributes» various from RL on basic data. For example, RL on thinking might improve over more training actions. [31]

The two V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and experienced similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist «more research study and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE». [31]

Architecturally, the V2 models were considerably customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the standard attention system by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and used the mixture of professionals (MoE) alternative formerly published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was less expensive than its peers with a price of 2 RMB for each million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they released 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the version at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related instruction data, then combined with a direction dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for mathematics issues was calculated by comparing with the ground-truth label. The reward for code problems was produced by a benefit model trained to forecast whether a program would pass the unit tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they released a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is essentially the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It contained a greater ratio of math and programming than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (mathematics, programs, logic) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, easy concern answering) data. Reasoning data was created by «expert models». Non-reasoning data was created by DeepSeek-V2.5 and checked by human beings. – The «professional models» were trained by starting with an unspecified base model, then SFT on both data, and synthetic data created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system timely asked the R1 to reflect and verify during thinking. Then the specialist designs were RL using an undefined benefit function.
– Each expert design was trained to create just synthetic reasoning information in one specific domain (mathematics, programming, reasoning).
– Expert models were used, rather of R1 itself, given that the output from R1 itself suffered «overthinking, bad format, and extreme length».

4. Model-based benefit designs were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice information containing both last benefit and chain-of-thought causing the last benefit. The reward model produced benefit signals for both concerns with unbiased however free-form responses, and concerns without objective responses (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both reward models and rule-based benefit. The rule-based reward was calculated for mathematics problems with a last response (put in a box), and for programs problems by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek team performed extensive low-level engineering to achieve efficiency. They utilized mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the standard 32-bit, requiring special GEMM regimens to build up properly. They utilized a custom 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They reduced the interaction latency by overlapping thoroughly computation and interaction, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU interaction. They reduced communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the precise machine each expert was on in order to avoid particular makers being queried regularly than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing techniques. [37]

After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 exceeded Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became available through DeepSeek’s API, as well as through a chat user interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for logical reasoning, mathematical thinking, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek claimed that it surpassed performance of OpenAI o1 on benchmarks such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it utilized 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached a solution quicker than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company also launched some «DeepSeek-R1-Distill» designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic data created by R1. [47]

A discussion in between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant first considers the thinking process in the mind and after that supplies the user with the response. The thinking procedure and response are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking procedure here respond to here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained exclusively utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they used no model-based reward. All benefit functions were rule-based, «mainly» of 2 types (other types were not specified): precision benefits and format benefits. Accuracy reward was checking whether a boxed answer is correct (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for programming). Format reward was inspecting whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has issues with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to address these issues and more enhance reasoning: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on «thousands» of «cold-start» data all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL process as R1-Zero, however likewise with a «language consistency benefit» to encourage it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal model not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking data from the internal model, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the generated reasoning had a wrong last response, then it is eliminated). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic data for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for reasoning jobs) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K information manufactured from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar way as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and responses

DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot apparently addresses questions, resolves reasoning problems and writes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests used by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 utilizes significantly less resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as numerous as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to require only about 2,000 GPUs, particularly the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta invested developing its most current AI innovation. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at reasonably very little expense has actually been acknowledged as possibly challenging the global supremacy of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a «Sputnik moment» for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 design was reportedly «on par with» one of OpenAI’s most current models when utilized for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley venture capitalist Marc Andreessen similarly described R1 as «AI’s Sputnik moment». [51]

DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media widely applauded DeepSeek as a national property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with experts and asked him to provide viewpoints and recommendations on a draft for comments of the annual 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of restricted resources has actually highlighted potential limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI development, that include export constraints on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI models subsequently «sparked market chaos» [57] and caused shares in major international innovation companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech firms also sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had caused record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of worth was rubbed out American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had mixed reactions to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are involved in the United States government-backed «Stargate Project» to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek «extremely excellent». [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed skepticism of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to utilize the design in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its new user registration to phone numbers from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a «massive» cyberattack interfered with the proper performance of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have observed that the official application programming interface (API) variation of R1, which runs from servers located in China, utilizes censorship systems for subjects that are considered politically sensitive for the government of China. For instance, the design refuses to answer concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may initially generate an answer, however then deletes it quickly later on and changes it with a message such as: «Sorry, that’s beyond my present scope. Let’s discuss something else.» [72] The incorporated censorship systems and restrictions can just be gotten rid of to a restricted extent in the open-source variation of the R1 model. If the «core socialist worths» specified by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, discussions are ended. [74] When tested by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as «an inalienable part of China’s territory,» and mentioned: «We firmly oppose any type of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are committed to attaining the complete reunification of the motherland through tranquil means.» [75] In January 2025, Western researchers had the ability to fool DeepSeek into giving specific responses to some of these topics by asking for in its answer to switch certain letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some specialists fear that the federal government of China might utilize the AI system for foreign influence operations, spreading disinformation, monitoring and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy conditions state «We store the details we gather in safe servers found in individuals’s Republic of China … We might gather your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you supply to our design and Services». Although the information storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired article reports this as security issues. [80] In action, the Italian data defense authority is looking for additional details on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of personal information, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had started a national security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government prohibited making use of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a questions into DeepSeek’s usage of individual details. [83]

Artificial intelligence market in China.

Notes

^ a b c The number of heads does not equal the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required picking «Deep Think enabled», and every user could utilize it just 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). «China’s low-cost, open AI design DeepSeek thrills scientists». Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). «The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world all set to blow». The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). «How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). «DeepSeek’s more affordable models and weaker chips bring into question trillions in AI facilities costs». Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). «Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may strike India’s AI aspirations». The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). «Nvidia investigation signals broadening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly». Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). «Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe». BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). «What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). «China’s DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you need to know». CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). «What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to slump?». CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). «Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants». ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). «Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.» The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). «ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key». Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). «How a leading Chinese AI model conquered US sanctions». MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). «Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker». ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). «Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.» CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).» [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says». Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). «Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI models are trained». South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). «The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer». Financial Times. Archived from the on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). «Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race». ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ «DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder». GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ «DeepSeek Coder». deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ «deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face». huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ «config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary». huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ «config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary». huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ «deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face». huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ «config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary». huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). «Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design exceeds Meta, OpenAI items». South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). «DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outperforms Llama and Qwen on launch». VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). «DeepSeek’s new AI design appears to be among the very best ‘open’ oppositions yet». TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ «Deepseek Log in page». DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ «News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: releasing supercharged thinking power!». DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). «DeepSeek’s first reasoning model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 efficiency». VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). «Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast». The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ «Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce». GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ «Chinese AI startup DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store». Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). «American AI has actually reached its Sputnik minute». The Hill. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). «‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn cleaned off US stocks after Chinese firm unveils AI chatbot» – by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). «Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets». BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). «What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business». CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ «DeepSeek presents an obstacle to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley». The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). «Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states». Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). «量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了» AI界拼多多»». finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). «Chinese AI business’s AI design development highlights limitations of US sanctions». Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ «DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot stimulates US market chaos, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia». BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). «Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap». Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). «DeepSeek triggers international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth». Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). «DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical». Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). «Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek’s open-source AI as «incredibly impressive»: «We must take the advancements out of China very, very seriously»». Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). «OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‘outstanding'». The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). «Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide». The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). «Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development «favorable»». Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). «China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street» – through NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). «Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders state on DeepSeek’s disruption». Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ «Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests enormous Nvidia GPU facilities». Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. «Big AWS customers, including Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models». Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). «DeepSeek struck with ‘large-scale’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops». The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. «DeepSeek temporarily limited new sign-ups, pointing out ‘massive harmful attacks'». Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). «Chinese AI has actually triggered a $1 trillion panic – and it does not care about totally free speech». The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). «DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot». Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). «We tried DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ «The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the rise of turmoil». The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). «Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'». NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). «China’s DeepSeek AI poses formidable cyber, information personal privacy hazards». Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). «Experts advise care over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). «DeepSeek’s success has actually painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back». LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ «Privacy policy». Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). «DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ «Italy regulator seeks details from DeepSeek on information defense». Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). «White House evaluates effect of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, authorities says». Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.