Tassarnasfavorit

Descripción

  • Fundada en julio 13, 2015
  • Sectores Tecnología
  • Publicado Trabajos 0
  • Ver 5

Descripción De La Empresa

Generative Expert System

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, especially large language designs (LLMs), made it possible for an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These consist of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image expert system image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu as well as numerous smaller sized companies have actually established generative AI models. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has utilizes throughout a large variety of markets, including software development, health care, financing, home entertainment, customer support, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, writing, [17] style, [18] and item design. [19] However, concerns have actually been raised about the potential misuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, making use of phony news or deepfakes to trick or control people, and the mass replacement of human tasks. [20] [21] Intellectual property law issues also exist around generative models that are trained on and emulate copyrighted artworks. [22]

Early history

Since its inception, researchers in the field have actually raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the repercussions of developing synthetic beings with human-like intelligence; these problems have previously been checked out by myth, fiction and philosophy because antiquity. [23] The concept of automatic art dates back a minimum of to the automata of ancient Greek civilization, where creators such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were explained as having actually developed makers capable of writing text, creating sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The tradition of imaginative automations has actually flourished throughout history, exemplified by Maillardet’s robot developed in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have actually long been used to design natural languages considering that their advancement by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov released his very first paper on the topic in 1906, [27] [28] and examined the pattern of vowels and consonants in the novel Eugeny Onegin utilizing Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is discovered on a text corpus, it can then be used as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic artificial intelligence

The scholastic discipline of expert system was developed at a research workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has experienced a number of waves of improvement and optimism in the decades because. [31] Artificial Intelligence research started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and researchers have utilized expert system to create creative works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was creating and showing generative AI works created by AARON, the computer program Cohen produced to produce paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI preparation or generative planning were used in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI planning systems, particularly computer-aided procedure planning, used to produce sequences of actions to reach a defined goal. [33] [34] Generative AI preparation systems used symbolic AI techniques such as state area search and restriction complete satisfaction and were a «relatively fully grown» innovation by the early 1990s. They were utilized to produce crisis action strategies for military usage, [35] process plans for making [33] and decision plans such as in prototype autonomous spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural nets (2014-2019)

Since its inception, the field of artificial intelligence utilized both discriminative designs and generative designs, to model and predict data. Beginning in the late 2000s, the development of deep learning drove progress and research study in image classification, speech recognition, natural language processing and other tasks. Neural networks in this period were typically trained as discriminative models, due to the trouble of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, improvements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first useful deep neural networks efficient in discovering generative models, as opposed to discriminative ones, for complex data such as images. These deep generative designs were the first to output not just class labels for images however also entire images.

In 2017, the Transformer network enabled advancements in generative designs compared to older Long-Short Term Memory designs, [38] causing the very first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), referred to as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which showed the capability to generalize not being watched to several jobs as a Structure model. [40]

The brand-new generative designs presented during this duration permitted for large neural networks to be trained using unsupervised knowing or semi-supervised knowing, instead of the supervised knowing normal of discriminative models. Unsupervised knowing got rid of the requirement for humans to by hand label information, permitting for bigger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, created by a confidential MIT researcher, was a complimentary web application that might produce persuading character voices utilizing minimal training information. [42] The platform is credited as the first mainstream service to popularize AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content creation, influencing subsequent developments in voice AI innovation. [43] [44]

In 2021, the development of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative design, marked an advance in AI-generated images. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further equalized access to premium expert system art development from natural language triggers. [46] These systems showed unprecedented abilities in producing photorealistic images, art work, and creates based upon text descriptions, resulting in widespread adoption among artists, designers, and the basic public.

In late 2022, the general public release of ChatGPT revolutionized the accessibility and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s ability to engage in natural conversations, generate innovative material, assist with coding, and carry out various analytical jobs caught global attention and triggered prevalent discussion about AI‘s prospective influence on work, education, and creativity. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI abilities. A team from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it «might fairly be deemed an early (yet still insufficient) version of a synthetic basic intelligence (AGI) system.» [49] However, this assessment was objected to by other scholars who maintained that generative AI remained «still far from reaching the benchmark of ‘basic human intelligence'» as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI design combining numerous techniques consisting of text, images, video, thermal data, 3D data, audio, and movement, paving the method for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google revealed Gemini, a multimodal AI design readily available in four versions: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The business integrated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed prepare for «Bard Advanced» powered by the larger Gemini Ultra model. [53] In February 2024, Google unified Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand name, launching a mobile app on Android and integrating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic released the Claude 3 family of big language models, including Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The models demonstrated considerable improvements in capabilities throughout various standards, with Claude 3 Opus especially outperforming leading models from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic released Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which showed enhanced efficiency compared to the bigger Claude 3 Opus, particularly in locations such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a study by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has become a global leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese respondents using the technology, going beyond both the worldwide average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This leadership is further evidenced by China’s intellectual home advancements in the field, with a UN report exposing that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, considerably going beyond the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is constructed by using unsupervised artificial intelligence (conjuring up for circumstances neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised machine finding out trained on a dataset. The capabilities of a generative AI system depend on the method or type of the data set utilized. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take only one type of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one kind of input. [59] For example, one version of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens include GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of big language designs). They can natural language processing, maker translation, and natural language generation and can be used as foundation designs for other tasks. [62] Data sets consist of BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, big language designs can be trained on shows language text, allowing them to create source code for new computer programs. [63] Examples include OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing high-quality visual art is a prominent application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions include Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Expert system art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are typically utilized for text-to-image generation and neural design transfer. [66] Datasets consist of LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can likewise be trained thoroughly on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech abilities. An early leader in this field was 15. ai, released in March 2020, which demonstrated the capability to clone character voices utilizing as little as 15 seconds of training information. [67] The site gained prevalent attention for its ability to create emotionally meaningful speech for various fictional characters, though it was later on taken offline in 2022 due to copyright issues. [68] [69] [70] Commercial options consequently emerged, consisting of ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can also be trained on the audio waveforms of recorded music along with text annotations, in order to create new musical samples based on text descriptions such as a calming violin tune backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have actually been produced, like the song Savages, which utilized AI to imitate rap artist Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted however their voices aren’t protected from regenerative AI yet, raising an argument about whether artists must get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have been developed that can be generated using a text phrase, genre alternatives, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on can generate temporally-coherent, detailed and photorealistic video clips. Examples consist of Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can also be trained on the motions of a robotic system to produce new trajectories for motion preparation or navigation. For example, UniPi from Google Research uses prompts like «choose up blue bowl» or «wipe plate with yellow sponge» to control motions of a robotic arm. [78] Multimodal «vision-language-action» models such as Google’s RT-2 can perform rudimentary thinking in response to user triggers and visual input, such as getting a toy dinosaur when given the prompt pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other things. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially intelligent computer-aided design (CAD) can use text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries could likewise be developed using linked open data of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are used as tools to assist improve workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI models are utilized to power chatbot items such as ChatGPT, programming tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image items such as Midjourney, and text-to-video items such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI functions have actually been integrated into a variety of existing commercially readily available products such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI designs are likewise offered as open-source software application, consisting of Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language model.

Smaller generative AI models with as much as a few billion specifications can operate on mobile phones, ingrained devices, and personal computers. For example, LLaMA-7B (a variation with 7 billion criteria) can run on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one variation of Stable Diffusion can run on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger models with 10s of billions of parameters can operate on laptop or desktop computer systems. To accomplish an acceptable speed, models of this size might need accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine included in Apple silicon products. For example, the 65 billion specification version of LLaMA can be configured to run on a desktop PC. [91]

The benefits of running generative AI locally include protection of privacy and copyright, and avoidance of rate restricting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in particular focuses on using consumer-grade video gaming graphics cards [92] through such methods as compression. That online forum is among just two sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language model criteria. [93] Yann LeCun has promoted open-source designs for their worth to vertical applications [94] and for enhancing AI safety. [95]

Language models with numerous billions of criteria, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, typically work on datacenter computers geared up with arrays of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These very large models are generally accessed as cloud services over the Internet.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China enforced restrictions on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips used for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were established to fulfill the requirements of the sanctions.

There is free software application on the marketplace capable of recognizing text generated by generative expert system (such as GPTZero), in addition to images, audio or video originating from it. [99] Potential mitigation techniques for spotting generative AI material consist of digital watermarking, content authentication, information retrieval, and maker knowing classifier designs. [100] Despite claims of accuracy, both complimentary and paid AI text detectors have actually regularly produced false positives, wrongly implicating students of sending AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and guideline

In the United States, a group of business including OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary agreement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated content. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 applied the Defense Production Act to need all US companies to report details to the federal government when training certain high-impact AI designs. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act includes requirements to reveal copyrighted material utilized to train generative AI systems, and to label any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services introduced by the Cyberspace Administration of China controls any public-facing generative AI. It consists of requirements to watermark created images or videos, regulations on training data and label quality, restrictions on personal information collection, and a standard that generative AI should «comply with socialist core values». [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted content

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on big, openly readily available datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI developers have actually argued that such training is protected under fair use, while copyright holders have argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of fair usage training have actually argued that it is a transformative usage and does not involve making copies of copyrighted works available to the public. [110] Critics have argued that image generators such as Midjourney can create nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] which generative AI programs contend with the content they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, a number of lawsuits related to using copyrighted product in training are ongoing. Getty Images has sued Stability AI over using its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have sued Microsoft and OpenAI over the usage of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated content

A different concern is whether AI-generated works can receive copyright security. The United States Copyright Office has actually ruled that works developed by artificial intelligence with no human input can not be copyrighted, due to the fact that they lack human authorship. [116] However, the workplace has also started taking public input to identify if these rules require to be improved for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The development of generative AI has actually raised issues from governments, businesses, and people, resulting in demonstrations, legal actions, contacts us to stop briefly AI experiments, and actions by numerous governments. In a July 2023 briefing of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres mentioned «Generative AI has massive potential for good and wicked at scale», that AI might «turbocharge global development» and contribute between $10 and $15 trillion to the global economy by 2030, but that its destructive usage «could cause horrific levels of death and damage, widespread injury, and deep psychological damage on an unimaginable scale». [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the development of AI, there have been arguments put forward by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether jobs that can be done by computer systems in fact need to be done by them, offered the difference between computers and humans, and in between quantitative computations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has led to 70% of the tasks for computer game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, advancements in generative AI contributed to the 2023 Hollywood labor disagreements. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that «synthetic intelligence postures an existential risk to innovative occupations» throughout the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has actually been seen as a possible challenge to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The crossway of AI and work issues among underrepresented groups internationally remains a crucial facet. While AI promises efficiency improvements and skill acquisition, issues about job displacement and biased recruiting processes continue amongst these groups, as described in surveys by Fast Company. To leverage AI for a more fair society, proactive steps incorporate mitigating biases, advocating transparency, appreciating privacy and permission, and welcoming diverse teams and ethical factors to consider. Strategies involve rerouting policy emphasis on policy, inclusive design, and education’s capacity for personalized mentor to maximize benefits while decreasing damages. [126]

Racial and gender predisposition

Generative AI models can show and enhance any cultural predisposition present in the underlying information. For instance, a language design may presume that medical professionals and judges are male, and that secretaries or nurses are female, if those predispositions prevail in the training information. [127] Similarly, an image design triggered with the text «a photo of a CEO» might disproportionately produce images of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially prejudiced information set. A variety of approaches for mitigating predisposition have actually been tried, such as altering input triggers [129] and reweighting training information. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of «deep learning» and «phony» [131] are AI-generated media that take an individual in an existing image or video and change them with somebody else’s likeness utilizing synthetic neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have gathered prevalent attention and concerns for their usages in deepfake celeb adult videos, vengeance porn, fake news, scams, health disinformation, financial fraud, and covert foreign election interference. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has actually elicited reactions from both market and federal government to discover and limit their use. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking business Logically found that the popular generative AI designs Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce possible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as images of electoral scams in the United States and Muslim ladies supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to utilize blockchain (distributed journal innovation) to promote «openness, verifiability, and decentralization in AI advancement and usage». [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software to generate questionable declarations in the singing design of celebs, public authorities, and other famous people have raised ethical concerns over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In reaction, business such as ElevenLabs have actually specified that they would work on mitigating potential abuse through safeguards and identity confirmation. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have spawned from AI-generated music. The exact same software used to clone voices has been used on famous artists’ voices to create tunes that simulate their voices, gaining both incredible appeal and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar methods have actually likewise been used to produce better quality or full-length versions of tunes that have been leaked or have yet to be released. [155]

Generative AI has also been utilized to create brand-new digital artist personalities, with some of these receiving sufficient attention to receive record offers at significant labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have actually also faced their reasonable share of criticism for their personified programs, consisting of backlash for «dehumanizing» an artform, and also producing artists which develop impractical or unethical interest their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s capability to develop practical phony content has actually been exploited in numerous kinds of cybercrime, consisting of phishing scams. [158] Deepfake video and audio have actually been used to create disinformation and fraud. In 2020, former Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that once deepfake videos end up being perfectly sensible, they would stop appearing exceptional to audiences, possibly leading to uncritical acceptance of incorrect details. [159] Additionally, large language designs and other kinds of text-generation AI have actually been used to produce phony reviews of e-commerce websites to boost scores. [160] Cybercriminals have developed big language designs focused on scams, including WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 research study revealed that generative AI can be vulnerable to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and prompt injection attacks, enabling opponents to obtain assist with hazardous demands, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other scientists have demonstrated that open-source models can be fine-tuned to eliminate their security limitations at low cost. [163]

Reliance on industry giants

Training frontier AI models requires a huge quantity of calculating power. Usually just Big Tech business have the financial resources to make such financial investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI wind up buying access to data centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and journalists have revealed issues about the ecological effect that the development and deployment of generative models are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] large amounts of freshwater used for information centers, [168] [169] and high quantities of electrical energy usage. [170] [166] [171] There is likewise concern that these effects might increase as these models are integrated into extensively utilized online search engine such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications become more popular; [170] [169] and as models require to be re-trained. [170]

Proposed mitigation strategies include factoring possible ecological costs prior to design advancement or data collection, [165] increasing effectiveness of information centers to reduce electricity/energy usage, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] developing more effective device discovering models, [168] [166] [169] reducing the variety of times that models need to be retrained, [167] developing a government-directed framework for auditing the environmental effect of these designs, [168] [167] managing for openness of these models, [167] managing their energy and water use, [168] encouraging scientists to release data on their designs’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the number of subject matter experts who comprehend both artificial intelligence and environment science. [167]

Content quality

The New York Times specifies slop as analogous to spam: «inferior or unwanted A.I. material in social networks, art, books and … in search engine result.» [172] Journalists have revealed concerns about the scale of low-quality generated material with respect to social media material small amounts, [173] the monetary incentives from social networks business to spread such material, [173] [174] false political messaging, [174] spamming of clinical research paper submissions, [175] increased time and effort to discover higher quality or preferred material on the Internet, [176] the indexing of created material by search engines, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper released by scientists at Amazon Web Services AI Labs found that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a snapshot of web pages, were maker equated. A number of these automated translations were viewed as lower quality, especially for sentences that were equated across a minimum of 3 languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were equated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that calculated word frequencies based on text from the Internet, announced that she had stopped upgrading the information for numerous factors: high costs for obtaining data from Reddit and Twitter, excessive concentrate on generative AI compared to other methods in the natural language processing community, which «generative AI has contaminated the data». [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools resulted in an explosion of AI-generated content throughout several domains. A research study from University College London estimated that in 2023, more than 60,000 scholarly articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely composed with LLM support. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, approximately 17.5% of newly published computer technology papers and 16.9% of peer review text now integrate content generated by LLMs. [183]

Visual content follows a comparable trend. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is approximated that an average of 34 million images have actually been developed daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had actually been created using text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these created by designs based on Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated content is consisted of in brand-new data crawls from the Internet for additional training of AI designs, flaws in the resulting designs may occur. [185] Training an AI design exclusively on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality model. Repeating this process, where each brand-new model is trained on the previous model’s output, results in progressive deterioration and ultimately results in a «model collapse» after numerous iterations. [186] Tests have been carried out with pattern recognition of handwritten letters and with pictures of human faces. [187] As a consequence, the worth of information gathered from authentic human interactions with systems might become significantly important in the existence of LLM-generated material in data crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, artificial information is frequently used as an alternative to information produced by real-world events. Such information can be released to verify mathematical designs and to train device learning designs while maintaining user personal privacy, [188] including for structured information. [189] The approach is not restricted to text generation; image generation has actually been employed to train computer vision models. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had actually been using an undisclosed internal AI tool to compose a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle released a fake AI-generated interview with former racing motorist Michael Schumacher, who had not made any public looks since 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a snowboarding accident. The story consisted of 2 possible disclosures: the cover consisted of the line «stealthily real», and the interview consisted of an acknowledgment at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired soon afterwards in the middle of the debate. [192]

Other outlets that have released posts whose material and/or byline have been confirmed or presumed to be created by generative AI models – frequently with false content, errors, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI use – consist of:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism kept in mind that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had used generative AI to produce posts for a number of the previously mentioned outlets, appeared to show that they «had produced tens of thousands of short articles for more than 150 publishers.» [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have actually presented news with anchors based on Generative AI designs, prompting issues about task losses for human anchors and audience trust in news that has historically been influenced by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, material developers or social networks influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically produced anchors have actually likewise been used by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google apparently pitched a tool to news outlets that declared to «produce newspaper article» based on input information supplied, such as «information of present occasions». Some news business executives who viewed the pitch described it as» [taking] for approved the effort that went into producing precise and artful news stories.» [224]

In February 2024, Google launched a program to pay small publishers to write 3 posts each day utilizing a beta generative AI model. The program does not require the knowledge or consent of the sites that the publishers are using as sources, nor does it need the released articles to be labeled as being developed or assisted by these designs. [225]

Many defunct news sites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blog sites (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have actually undergone cybersquatting, with articles created by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have actually expressed issue that generative AI might have a damaging influence on regional news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to money local news outlets for experimenting with generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI business developing a dependence for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based upon Llama 3 which sums up news stories, was kept in mind by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to possibly additional decrease the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In response to potential mistakes around the usage and misuse of generative AI in journalism and fret about declining audience trust, outlets worldwide, consisting of publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have actually published guidelines around how they prepare to use and not utilize AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute released their Digital New Report for 2024. In a study of individuals in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uneasy with news produced by «mostly AI with some human oversight», and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfy. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfortable with news produced by «primarily human with some aid from AI». The results of international surveys reported that individuals were more unpleasant with news topics including politics (46%), crime (43%), and regional news (37%) produced by AI than other news topics. [241]

Computer programs portal

Technology portal

Artificial basic intelligence – Type of AI with extensive capabilities
Artificial creativity – Artificial simulation of human imagination
Expert system art – Visual media created with AI
Artificial life – Field of study
Chatbot – Program that mimics discussion
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep knowing method
Generative pre-trained transformer – Type of big language design
Large language design – Kind of device learning design
Music and expert system – Usage of expert system to create music
Generative AI pornography – Explicit material produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which data is produced algorithmically rather than manually
Retrieval-augmented generation – Kind of details retrieval using LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term utilized in machine learning

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). «Executive Order N-12-23» (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). «Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework». arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ «What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?». McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ «What is generative AI?». IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). «Expert System Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). «Generative models». OpenAI. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). «Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding». The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). «A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings». Bloomberg News. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). «OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). «LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications». arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). «A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze». The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). «OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ «The race of the AI labs heats up». The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). «Google Cloud brings generative AI to developers, companies, and governments». Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the initial on March 28, 2024, recovered January 21, 2024
^ «Don’t fear an AI-induced jobs apocalypse simply yet». The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). «In Hollywood writers’ battle against AI, human beings win (in the meantime)». AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. «Generative AI: Unlocking the future of style». Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ «How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity». Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). «Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI». techpolicy.press. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). «Misinformation refilled? Fears about the effect of generative AI on false information are overblown». Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ «New AI systems hit copyright law». BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York City: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robotic from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the original on January 13, 2018, recovered October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), «The Automata in the Byzantine «Throne of Solomon»», Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). «Maillardet’s Automaton». The Franklin Institute. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the initial on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). «First Links in the Markov Chain». American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). «The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications». Artificial intelligence. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Search for Artificial Intelligence. New York, New York: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). «A Brief History of Generative AI» (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Much Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the initial on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). «Computer assisted process planning: the state-of-the-art survey». The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). «Automated planning and scheduling for goal-based self-governing spacecraft». IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Air Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a standard generative AI organizer based on the HSTS planning structure (Muscettola, 1994), and our control component is a conventional spacecraft mindset control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also include an architectural part explicitly devoted to world modeling (the mode identifier), and identify between control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Artificial intelligence: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). «A Thorough Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT». arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ «finetune-transformer-lm». GitHub. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). «Language models are unsupervised multitask students» (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). «Improving language understanding with not being watched knowing». OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). «Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Artificial intelligence». Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). «15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon». The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). «Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?». Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have actually been around in some kind because ’15. ai’ launched in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). «OpenAI’s DALL-E develops possible images of actually anything you ask it to». TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ «Stable Diffusion Public Release». Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). «What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it change human beings?». The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). «How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an «anything tool»». Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). «Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early try outs GPT-4». arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). «ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science». Journal of Information Technology. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ «Meta open-sources multisensory AI model that integrates six kinds of information». May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). «Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI». The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). «Google launches Gemini-an effective AI model it states can go beyond GPT-4». Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). «Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant». The New York Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ «Introducing the next generation of Claude». Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). «Anthropic unveils Claude 3, going beyond GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests». Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). «Anthropic has a fast new AI model – and a smart brand-new way to engage with chatbots». The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). «China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, survey programs». Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ «A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4″. March 21, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ «Explainer: What is Generative AI, the technology behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?». Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). «Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Live.'». The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). «On the opportunities and threats of structure models». arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). «Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code». arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ «Buying Cursor». Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex «Sandy»; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). «Art and the science of generative AI». Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). «Zero-shot text-to-image generation». International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). «Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Artificial intelligence». Towards Data Science. Archived from the initial on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). «15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon». The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). «Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App». Game Informer. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). «ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる» [Game Character Voice Reading Software «15. ai» Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the initial on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that only English voices are available.; Another significant feature of 15. ai is its abundant psychological expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). «A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless». The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). «MusicLM: Generating Music From Text». arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). «Meta in June stated that it utilized 20,000 hours of licensed music to train MusicGen, which included 10,000 «premium» certified music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers described in a paper the ethical obstacles that they experienced around the development of generative AI models like MusicGen». Archived from the original on August 15, 2023.
^ «Jay-Z’s Delaware manufacturer triggers argument over AI rights». Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ «10 «Best» AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI». October 19, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). «Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology». The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). «Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text». cnet.com. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). «UniPi: Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation». Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). «RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control». arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). «10 Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) 3D Generators». eWEEK. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ «Slash CAD design construct times with new AI-driven part creation method|GlobalSpec». Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ «The Role of Expert System (AI) in the CAD Industry». March 22, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). «GitHub has a vision to make code more safe by design». Axios Codebook. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). «Text-to-video AI inches closer as startup Runway reveals brand-new design». The Verge. Archived from the original on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though current output is fundamental. Runway says it’ll be making its brand-new generative video model, Gen-2, readily available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). «Microsoft adds OpenAI innovation to Word and Excel». CNBC. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative synthetic intelligence technologies such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of business software … the new A.I. features, called Copilot, will be offered in some of the business’s most popular service apps, including Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). «The app’s Memories feature simply got a big upgrade». TechRadar. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting an upgraded, AI-powered Memories function … you’ll be able to utilize generative AI to come up with some recommended names like «a desert adventure».
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). «Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop». MediaPost. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative expert system (AI) will end up being one of the most essential functions for creative designers and online marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill function in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI capabilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). «LLaMA 2: How to access and use Meta’s versatile open-source chatbot right now». VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you wish to run LLaMA 2 on your own maker or modify the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI models.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). «How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4». Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can develop a ChatGPT-like server based upon LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). «»Draw Things» App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone». The Decoder. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are produced locally, so you do not require a Web connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). «Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in the house (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)». Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA model in your home, you will require a computer construct with a powerful GPU that can deal with the large quantity of data and computation required for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). «Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot». Ziff Davis. Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). «I practically only trust two LLM evals today» (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). «Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …» (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). «Open source platforms * increase * safety and security» (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). «U.S. officials order Nvidia to halt sales of leading AI chips to China». Reuters. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). «Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed». Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 runs at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while abiding by stringent U.S. export standards that limit how much processing power Nvidia can offer.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). «How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions». Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ «5 complimentary software application to identify phony AI-generated images» (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ «Detecting AI finger prints: A guide to watermarking and beyond». Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the initial on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). «We checked a brand-new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent student». washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). «Detecting AI might be difficult. That’s a huge problem for instructors». washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). «OpenAI, Google, others pledge to watermark AI content for safety, White House says». Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023.
^ «FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence». The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). «3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI». Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ «EU AI Act: first guideline on expert system». European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). «EU lawmakers choose harder AI guidelines as draft transfer to final phase». Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). «China says generative AI guidelines to use just to products for the general public». Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ «生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法». July 13, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b «Generative Expert system and Copyright Law». Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). «We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image». The New York City Times. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). «The New York Times takes legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft for using its stories to train chatbots». Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the initial on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). «Photo giant Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s also accepting the innovation». AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). «The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Getting Started». Wired. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). «New York City Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement». Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). «AI-generated art can not receive copyrights, US court states». Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). «US Copyright Office wishes to hear what individuals think of AI and copyright». The Verge. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ «Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Expert System». un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ «The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI». Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). «Lessons from Eliza». The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). «AI is already taking video game illustrators’ jobs in China». Rest of World. Archived from the initial on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). «China’s video game art industry supposedly decimated by growing AI use». Game Developer. Archived from the original on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). «Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging usage of innovative tech». NBC News. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has joined the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in requiring an agreement that explicitly requires AI regulations to safeguard authors and the works they develop. … The future of generative synthetic intelligence in Hollywood-and how it can be used to replace labor-has become a vital sticking point for actors going on strike. In a news conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more commonly understood as SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘artificial intelligence poses an existential risk to creative professions, and all stars and performers are worthy of contract language that safeguards them from having their identity and talent made use of without consent and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). «ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools release out of beta». TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. «‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods». Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). «Underrepresented groups in countries around the globe are stressed about AI being a hazard to tasks». Fast Company. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). «Large language models are biased. Can reasoning assist conserve them?». MIT CSAIL. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). «Reducing bias and enhancing security in DALL · E 2». OpenAI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). «No quick repair: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 illustrated the difficulties of bias in AI». NBC News. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ «DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations». OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). «Terrifying modern pornography: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise». Fox News. Archived from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). «We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now». Vice. Archived from the initial on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ «What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying». Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the initial on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ «Experts fear face switching tech could start a global face-off». The Outline. Archived from the original on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). «Here Come the Fake Videos, Too». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). «Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting». arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). «Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance». JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the initial on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). «U.S. braces for foreign disturbance in 2024 election». Semafor. Archived from the original on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). «Russia, Iran utilize AI to increase anti-U.S. impact campaigns, officials state». The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ «Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)». deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). «H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019». www.congress.gov. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ «New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections». Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). «Disinformation wars: The battle against phony news in the age of AI». New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). «Navigating the obstacles of generative technologies: Proposing the combination of expert system and blockchain». Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ «People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips». PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ «The generative A.I. software race has started». Fortune. Archived from the original on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). «Elections in UK and US at danger from AI-driven disinformation, state professionals». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ «Seeing is thinking? Global scramble to deal with deepfakes». news.yahoo.com. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). «4chan users welcome AI voice clone tool to generate celebrity hatespeech». The Verge. Archived from the original on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). «Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.» The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ «A brand-new AI voice tool is currently being abused to make deepfake star audio clips». Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). «Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good». Wanderer. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). «An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World». The New York Times. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). «AI songs that imitate popular artists raising alarms in the music industry». ABC News. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. «Fans Are Using Expert System to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs». Complex. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. «Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?». Forbes. Archived from the original on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). «Warner Music indications first-ever record offer with AI pop star». New York Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). «Deepfakes: Get ready for phishing 2.0». Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. «As social networks platforms brace for the inbound wave of deepfakes, Google’s previous ‘scams czar’ predicts the biggest risk is that deepfakes will eventually end up being boring». Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). «Fake evaluations: can we trust what we read online as usage of AI explodes?». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ «After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data». PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). «From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy». IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). «Should we make our most effective AI designs open source to all?». Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). «In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends». New York Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). «On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?». Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d «AI is an energy hog. This is what it suggests for climate change». MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). «The carbon impact of synthetic intelligence». Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). «Generative AI’s ecological expenses are skyrocketing – and mostly secret». Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the initial on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. «AI’s Energy Demands Run out Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). «Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer researcher discusses the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins». The Conversation. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). «Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). «First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We’ve Got ‘Slop'». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b «Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook». Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). «The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop». The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). «Research AI design suddenly tries to customize its own code to extend runtime». Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). «Spam, junk … slop? The current wave of AI behind the ‘zombie web'». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). «Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles». 404 Media. Archived from the original on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ «Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop». Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). «A Stunning Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism». Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual conference: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). «A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine». VICE. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). «Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'». 404 Media. Archived from the initial on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has always been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq used, «it was workable and frequently identifiable. Large language models produce text that masquerades as real language with intent behind it, although there is none, and their output appear everywhere,» she wrote. She provides the example that ChatGPT overuses the word «delve,» in a method that people do not, which has tossed off the frequency of this specific word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). «ChatGPT «contamination»: estimating the frequency of LLMs in the academic literature». arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). «Just How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?». Human-Centered Expert System. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). «AI Image Statistics for 2024: How Much Content Was Created by AI». Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). «AI models collapse when trained on recursively produced data». Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). «When A.I.’s Output Is a Threat to A.I. Itself». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ «Self-Consuming Generative Models Go Mad». ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). «Synthetic Data for Better Machine Learning». databricks.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). «Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data». kdnuggets.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). «Evaluating an Artificial Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion». arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). «CNET discovered errors in more than half of its AI-written stories». The Verge. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ «A publication touted Michael Schumacher’s very first interview in years. It was in fact AI». NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). «Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is «Entirely» Comprised». Futurism. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ «NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘writes fiction’ utilizing AI». Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). «Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers». Futurism. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). «Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article». Futurism. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). «B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Phony Person». PetaPixel. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). «USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage». Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). «Dispatch pauses AI sports composing program». Axios. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). «Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today website. Did these writers exist?». Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioning «Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry». Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). «How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business». CNN. Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). «News Corp using AI to produce 3,000 Australian regional news stories a week». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). «Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Relocate To AI Content». Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). «Pertaining to your web, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories». Vox. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). «The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb». Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). «Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based Upon Other AI Slop, Along With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors». Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). «Irish Times apologises for scam AI article about females’s use of fake tan». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). «CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error». Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). «BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles». Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ «Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom». Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ «What’s in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated local news, whatever – and nothing». Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ «AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for traditional publishers?». San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). «A nationwide network of local news sites is releasing AI-written short articles under phony bylines. Experts are raising alarm». CNN. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ «Wyoming press reporter caught utilizing expert system to produce fake quotes and stories». Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ «Cosmos Magazine releases AI-generated posts, drawing criticism from reporters, co-founders». ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ «AI-generated short articles are permeating major news publications». National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). «Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans». Wired. Archived from the original on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ «Apple says it will upgrade AI function after incorrect news notifies». The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the original on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ «TV channels are using AI-generated speakers to check out the news. The question is, will we trust them?». BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). «‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). «World’s very first AI news anchor unveiled in China». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ «These ISIS news anchors are AI fakes. Their propaganda is genuine». Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). «Google Tests A.I. Tool That Is Able to Write News Articles». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). «Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform». Adweek. Archived from the original on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). «Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). «How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Developed Into an AI Clickbait Farm». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). «A Cherished Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff». 404 Media. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). «Early Apple tech bloggers are surprised to discover their name and work have actually been AI-zombified». The Verge. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ «AI slop is currently invading Oregon’s regional journalism». Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). «How a Little Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). «We Need Your Email Address». 404 Media. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ «Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket». Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). «Senators warn AI could result in ‘destruction’ of regional news». Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ «OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus local news offer». Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). «Meta left news. Now the company’s utilizing it for AI content». Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ «How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools». Wired. Archived from the initial on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). «Standards around generative AI». Associated Press. Archived from the initial on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). «The Guardian’s approach to generative AI». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). «Policies in parallel? A comparative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations». pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). «Digital News Report 2024» (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.